Answer the prompts (be honest, not perfect)
Pick the response that matches you most of the time. There are no “right” answers — the goal is awareness and language for patterns.
A fast, non‑clinical self‑reflection tool based on common attachment patterns. Answer the prompts the way you usually show up in close relationships (romantic, close friends, or family). You’ll get an estimated mix across Secure, Anxious, Avoidant, and Fearful‑Avoidant styles — plus a simple 0–100 clarity score and practical next steps.
Pick the response that matches you most of the time. There are no “right” answers — the goal is awareness and language for patterns.
This calculator turns your answers into four sub‑scores (Secure, Anxious, Avoidant, Fearful‑Avoidant), then summarizes them into an easy snapshot. It’s intentionally simple and transparent so it’s useful for self‑reflection — not a diagnosis.
You answer 12 statements using a 0–4 scale: 0 = Not me, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Very true. Each statement reflects a common pattern that shows up when people feel connected, uncertain, or in conflict.
The prompts are grouped into four clusters (3 questions each). For each cluster we compute an average and convert it to a 0–100 score:
Because answers range from 0 to 4, we map them into 0–100 using: (average ÷ 4) × 100. So an average of 2.0 (“Sometimes”) becomes 50/100, while an average of 3.2 becomes 80/100.
Most real people don’t fit into one box. Instead, you’ll see a mix: maybe Secure is highest, Anxious is moderate, Avoidant is low, and Fearful‑Avoidant is low — or maybe you have two high scores. We label your primary style as the highest sub‑score, but we also highlight when you have a close “runner‑up.” That runner‑up is often the more useful coaching clue.
The big number at the top is not “how good” you are. It’s a clarity score — a proxy for how stable and predictable your closeness patterns are in the chosen context.
We compute it like this:
In math form: Clarity = clamp( Secure − 0.35×Anxious − 0.35×Avoidant − 0.30×Fearful, 0, 100 ). The weights are chosen so the clarity score stays intuitive: when Secure is high and the others are low, clarity rises; when push‑pull or high anxiety/avoidance dominate, clarity drops.
Suppose in a dating context you answer “Often” (3) to the anxious prompts and “Sometimes” (2) to secure prompts, while avoidant is low. That might produce: Secure avg=2.0 → 50, Anxious avg=3.0 → 75, Avoidant avg=1.0 → 25, Fearful avg=1.5 → 38. Your primary style is Anxious, but you still have some Secure capacity. Clarity ≈ 50 − 0.35×75 − 0.35×25 − 0.30×38 ≈ 4 → a low clarity score. That doesn’t mean “bad.” It means the context is likely triggering uncertainty, and reassurance/repair skills matter a lot.
No. This is a lightweight self‑reflection estimator based on common patterns described in attachment theory. It can help you notice tendencies, but it is not a diagnostic test and it can’t replace professional evaluation.
Yes. Attachment patterns are shaped by experience and can shift with healthier relationships, therapy, self‑work, and life circumstances. Many people become more secure over time.
Attachment is relational. You might feel secure with friends but anxious when dating, or secure with a long‑term partner but avoidant with family. That’s normal — context tells you what activates you.
Avoidant patterns often look like “I’m fine on my own; closeness feels heavy.” Fearful‑Avoidant patterns look like “I want closeness, but I don’t feel safe, so I pull away.” In other words: avoidant = distance feels safer; fearful‑avoidant = closeness and distance can both feel unsafe.
Treat it like a dashboard. Pick one prompt you scored high on, then choose one small skill to practice for a week: a clearer request, a calmer check‑in, or a kinder boundary. Re‑test monthly to track change.
That’s common. Two high scores can mean your patterns shift by situation. Use the runner‑up score as a clue about what activates you — especially under stress.
Be gentle with yourself. Patterns are learned responses, not character flaws. If relationships feel consistently painful or you feel unsafe, consider reaching out to a licensed mental health professional.
Here are more personality and psychology calculators people often try next:
Use these as gentle starting points. Your lived context matters. Two people can share the same score but for different reasons.
If relationship patterns repeatedly feel painful or unsafe, support from a licensed therapist can be powerful.
MaximCalculator builds fast, human-friendly tools. Always treat results as educational self‑reflection. Don’t use this tool to label or diagnose yourself or others. If you’re in an unsafe relationship or feel in crisis, contact local emergency services or a qualified professional.