Enter your funnel numbers
Tip: if you don’t know a number, use your best estimate and adjust later. The results update instantly.
Cart abandonment is the silent revenue leak in most ecommerce stores. This calculator estimates how many orders, how much revenue, and how much gross profit you’re likely losing because shoppers start checkout but don’t finish — and how much you can recover with abandonment emails/SMS and a lower abandonment rate.
Tip: if you don’t know a number, use your best estimate and adjust later. The results update instantly.
The goal of this calculator is to translate a percentage into something actionable: how many orders are leaking and what that leak is worth in revenue and gross profit. Cart abandonment is typically reported as a single number (like “70%”), but that number only becomes a business priority when you can say, “We’re losing $X per month because checkout doesn’t convert.”
To do that, we model a straightforward funnel. First, we estimate how many shoppers reach the cart and then begin checkout. Finally, we apply the abandonment rate to estimate how many checkout starts do not become purchases. Because most stores run recovery tactics (email, SMS, retargeting, on-site nudges), we also include a recovery rate to represent the share of abandoned checkouts you win back.
Carts are estimated from your sessions and add-to-cart rate:
Example: 50,000 sessions per month and a 6% add-to-cart rate yields 50,000 × 0.06 = 3,000 carts.
Not every cart turns into a checkout attempt. Some shoppers add to cart to “save” items or get a shipping estimate later. We estimate checkout starts using the checkout start rate:
Example: 3,000 carts and a 65% checkout-start rate yields 3,000 × 0.65 = 1,950 checkout starts.
Abandonment is applied at the checkout-start stage. If your abandonment rate is 70%, then 70% of checkout starts do not convert into purchases—unless you recover some of them later with follow-ups.
This is why a small recovery rate can be meaningful. Even recovering 5–10% of abandonments can produce a noticeable lift when checkout volume is high.
Revenue loss is estimated using your average order value (AOV). Profit loss uses gross margin, which approximates what you keep after product costs (COGS) but before marketing and overhead.
The most viral and useful part: you can set a target abandonment rate (say, 55% instead of 70%) and see the upside. This answers: “If we improved checkout conversion, what would it be worth?” We keep everything else the same (sessions, add-to-cart, checkout starts, AOV, margin, recovery rate) and compute the difference in completed orders and revenue.
Real-world note: lowering abandonment often requires a mix of changes—faster checkout, clearer totals, better payments, trust cues, and a cleaner mobile experience. But it’s easier to prioritize those changes when you can attach a monthly dollar value to them.
Your result has four “headline” numbers: estimated checkout starts, lost orders, lost revenue, and lost gross profit. Use them differently:
If you want a simple priority rule: first make sure the checkout reliably works for the most common device and payment method. Then reduce “price surprise” and friction. Finally, optimize recovery flows.
These examples show how the same abandonment rate can mean very different dollar loss depending on your traffic and AOV. If you don’t have your exact funnel numbers yet, start with one of these and adjust toward your store.
Suppose your store gets 50,000 sessions/month, 6% add-to-cart, 65% checkout start, 70% abandonment, 8% recovery, $75 AOV, and 50% gross margin.
Now imagine the same funnel volume, but AOV is $180 and margin is 60%. Loss scales quickly: lost orders × AOV makes abandonment far more expensive. Even modest improvements can be worth tens of thousands per month.
A smaller store with 8,000 sessions/month and 4% add-to-cart might have fewer checkout starts, so checkout redesign might not be the first priority. But if the store has strong margins and runs paid traffic, improving abandonment can still be one of the highest ROI moves—because you’re improving the return on ad spend.
Using Example 1, reducing abandonment from 70% to 55% means 15 percentage points fewer lost checkouts. With 1,950 checkout starts, that’s roughly 293 additional purchases before recovery effects. Multiply by AOV and you get an immediate sense of what “better checkout” could be worth.
No calculator can perfectly model every store. This one makes a few deliberate simplifications:
The benefit of these assumptions is clarity: you get a solid estimate quickly and can test “what-if” scenarios. If you want more precision, plug in your real checkout-start count or run the calculator separately for mobile vs desktop.
Some abandonment is normal because shoppers browse, compare prices, or get distracted. The goal isn’t “zero.” The goal is reducing avoidable friction and recovering shoppers who intended to buy.
“Cart abandonment” is often used as a catch-all. In analytics, you may see both: (1) people who add to cart but never start checkout, and (2) people who start checkout but don’t finish. This calculator focuses on the second: checkout starts → purchases.
It varies by list size, product type, incentives, and deliverability. Many stores see single-digit recovery from email alone, and higher when combining SMS, on-site reminders, and retargeting. Use your real number if you track it; otherwise start with 5–10%.
Gross margin is safer for quick planning because net profit depends heavily on marketing and fixed costs. If you want net impact, you can approximate net profit by subtracting average fulfillment cost per order and marketing cost per order from AOV before multiplying.
Focus on clarity and trust: show shipping/taxes early, speed up checkout, remove unnecessary steps, add popular payments, and make returns/shipping policies obvious. Discounts can help, but the best win is usually removing friction.
Because abandonment applies to a high-intent stage. If hundreds or thousands start checkout, a 60–80% abandonment rate means many potential orders. Use the “target abandonment rate” slider to see what even a modest improvement is worth.
Compare “checkout starts” from your analytics (GA4, Shopify, etc.) with the calculator’s estimate. If the estimate is off, adjust add-to-cart and checkout-start rates until they match your observed checkout starts. Then the lost revenue estimate becomes much more accurate.
Not directly. If you want that, set checkout start rate lower to represent fewer carts that reach checkout, or run separate analysis for “add to cart → checkout start” leakage.
Yes, conceptually. Treat “checkout starts” as “form starts” and AOV as the value per conversion. The logic is the same: starts × (1 − completion) × value = loss.
These tools pair well with abandonment optimization:
MaximCalculator builds fast, human-friendly tools. Use results as estimates for planning and prioritization. If you’re making major investments (platform change, payment provider, checkout redesign), validate with your analytics data and controlled experiments.