Rate the connection
Pick a timeframe, then move each slider. Your score updates instantly as you adjust sliders. (There are no “right” answers — this is about noticing patterns.)
A quick, non‑clinical self‑reflection check for any relationship (partner, friend, family member, coworker, mentor). Rate the “felt reality” of the connection — trust, emotional safety, communication, repair — then get a simple 0–100 score with practical next steps.
Pick a timeframe, then move each slider. Your score updates instantly as you adjust sliders. (There are no “right” answers — this is about noticing patterns.)
Each slider is scored from 1 to 10. We then compute a weighted average — because some pillars (like safety and trust) stabilize everything else. Finally, we scale the result to 0–100 so it’s easy to interpret and track over time.
Let each dimension be a value from 1–10: trust, safety, comm, effort, repair, joy, consistency. Compute:
Why subtract 1 and divide by 9? Because the sliders start at 1 (not 0). This mapping turns: 1 → 0, 5.5 → ~50, and 10 → 100.
These are simplified examples to show how the score behaves. The most useful part is not the final number — it’s which sliders are lowest. That’s your action plan.
Trust 4, Safety 6, Communication 6, Effort 5, Repair 5, Joy 8, Consistency 3. The relationship feels fun, but promises are shaky. The score typically lands in the mixed range. A single high “joy” slider can’t fully compensate for low trust/consistency.
Trust 7, Safety 7, Communication 8, Effort 6, Repair 6, Joy 5, Consistency 8. This is stable and clear, but not very playful (which may be totally fine at work). The score usually falls into the healthy/workable band.
Trust 3, Safety 2, Communication 4, Effort 7, Repair 3, Joy 7, Consistency 2. Notice the pattern: lots of effort and highs, but low safety and low consistency. The score tends to be fragile. The best next step isn’t “try harder” — it’s create safety and boundaries.
Run the score twice: once for “how it feels lately” and once for “your ideal.” The gap is a clear conversation starter: “What would move this slider up by 1 point?”
Think of the Connection Quality Score like a dashboard. It doesn’t diagnose the engine. It tells you what to check.
“Today” captures a mood; “Last 7 days” captures a pattern; “Last 30–90 days” captures the relationship climate. If you’re making decisions, use at least 7–30 days to reduce “one bad day” bias.
A common trap is rating based on what someone could be. For accuracy, ask: “If a friend watched our last few interactions, what would they score?”
The calculator automatically identifies your lowest dimensions and turns them into a short action plan. Improving a relationship often looks like raising one slider by one point — not “fixing everything.”
Save weekly snapshots. Trend beats perfection. A relationship moving from 52 → 60 over a month is meaningful, even if it’s not “perfect.” If you’re in a consistently unsafe dynamic, consider seeking support.
No. It’s an educational self‑reflection tool. It cannot diagnose attachment, trauma, or mental health conditions.
Yes. The sliders map to any connection where trust, safety, clarity, repair, and effort matter.
Use a longer timeframe (30–90 days) and interpret with context. Some sliders may dip temporarily. The key is whether the relationship remains repairable.
Feeling like you can speak honestly without being mocked, punished, threatened, or dismissed. Safety doesn’t mean “no conflict.” It means conflict can happen without fear.
Joy matters — but in most relationships, safety and trust determine whether joy is sustainable. Fun without safety often becomes a rollercoaster.
Consider support: a trusted friend, coach, therapist, mediator, or community resource depending on your situation. If you feel unsafe or in crisis, contact local emergency services immediately.
Weekly is ideal for trend tracking. Daily can be useful during active repair or conflict cycles.
No. A score is data, not destiny. You still get to choose what’s right for you. The most useful outcome is clarity about what you need.
Use this score to notice patterns, guide conversations, and build healthier habits — not to diagnose or label yourself or someone else. If you’re dealing with coercion, threats, or ongoing harm, prioritize safety and seek local support resources.
MaximCalculator builds fast, human-friendly tools. Always treat results as educational self‑reflection, and double-check any important decisions with qualified professionals.