Rate your distraction triggers
Pick a timeframe, then move each slider from 1 (rarely affects me) to 10 (pulls me off‑task fast). Tip: answer based on typical days, not your best day.
A fast, non‑clinical self‑reflection check for “focus drift.” Rate how strongly you get pulled off‑task by notifications, noise, interruptions, and internal mind‑wandering — then get a simple 0–100 score plus a personalized Focus Shield plan.
Pick a timeframe, then move each slider from 1 (rarely affects me) to 10 (pulls me off‑task fast). Tip: answer based on typical days, not your best day.
Each slider is rated from 1 (rarely distracts you) to 10 (distracts you quickly). Most sliders increase the score. One slider — Recovery speed — is protective, so it’s inverted in the calculation (fast recovery reduces sensitivity).
drag = 11 − recovery.((avg − 1) / 9) × 100.Your score reflects how easily your attention gets pulled away and how costly it is to return. A higher score doesn’t mean you’re “bad at focus” — it often means your environment, workload, or tools are set up to constantly trigger your attention system.
Example 1: “Phone tug” (high notifications, otherwise okay)
Notifications 9, Visual 4, Noise 4, Interruptions 5, Switching 6, Mind‑wandering 5, Reactivity 4, Recovery 7.
Result: usually a mid score because one strong trigger keeps tugging your attention.
Fix: batch notifications + home screen cleanup + focus mode during key blocks.
Example 2: “Open office” (noise + interruptions + re‑entry)
Notifications 5, Visual 6, Noise 9, Interruptions 8, Switching 6, Mind‑wandering 5, Reactivity 6, Recovery 4.
Result: often a high score because re‑entry is costly. Fix: noise control (headphones),
“do not disturb” signals, and a 10‑second re‑entry ritual (next action).
Example 3: “Internal drift” (mind‑wandering + switching)
Notifications 3, Visual 4, Noise 3, Interruptions 4, Switching 8, Mind‑wandering 9, Reactivity 7, Recovery 5.
Result: a high score even with a quiet environment. Fix: shorter focus sprints (10–20 minutes),
externalize next action, and reduce open loops (write them down).
Instead of trying to force willpower, this tool helps you build a small “shield” around attention. A shield can be a setting, a physical cue, a routine, or a boundary that reduces pull and lowers re‑entry cost.
No. This is a self‑reflection tool about distraction triggers and recovery. Many things can affect attention (sleep, stress, workload, environment, mental health). If you’re concerned, a licensed professional can help.
Distraction is often a systems issue. If your tools deliver constant novelty and your environment is noisy, your brain is doing something normal: orienting to new signals. Shields reduce the triggers so discipline is easier.
Because you will get distracted sometimes. The skill that matters is how quickly you return to the task. Recovery is trainable with tiny rituals (breath, write next action, restart timer).
Weekly works well. Use “Last 7 days,” save the result, and compare trends. It’s more useful than a one‑time score.
Treat it as a signal to reduce triggers and lower pressure, not as a label. Start with your top two triggers and add one shield each. If you feel overwhelmed or stuck, consider reaching out for support.
Distraction sensitivity is basically a mismatch between how many attention triggers hit you and how much cognitive bandwidth you have to handle them. When bandwidth is high, you can ignore a ping, refocus after a quick question, and keep moving. When bandwidth is low, the same ping becomes a derailment.
The key thing most people miss is that distraction has two phases. First is the pull: something captures your attention — a sound, a vibration, a thought, a new tab, a worry. Second is the re‑entry: returning to the task and reconstructing the mental context (What was I doing? Where was I? What was the next action?). Re‑entry is where productivity and mood often get hit, because context rebuilding is slow, effortful, and frustrating.
That’s why this calculator asks about both the pull (notifications, noise, clutter, mind‑wandering) and the re‑entry cost (interruptions, emotional reactivity) — plus the one skill that can counterbalance it: recovery speed. People who “seem focused” often aren’t magically immune to distraction; they’ve designed their environment to reduce triggers and they’ve trained quick recovery habits.
There’s also a compounding effect. Small distractions create open loops — unfinished micro‑tasks in your head (“I should reply,” “I should check,” “I should remember”). Open loops increase cognitive load. Higher load increases mind‑wandering and emotional reactivity. Higher reactivity makes recovery slower. Slower recovery makes you feel behind, and feeling behind increases the urge to check more things. That loop is why distraction can feel like quicksand.
The “Focus Shield” plan is designed to break the loop with minimal effort. Instead of trying to become a different person, you change the situation in tiny ways:
One of the most viral (and effective) ways to use this tool is as a 7‑day experiment: screenshot your score, share it with a friend, and then build two shields. If your score drops even 5–10 points, you’ll usually notice it emotionally, too — less irritability, less “why can’t I focus,” and more confidence that you can create momentum again.
If you want to go deeper, treat your highest slider as a hypothesis. For example, if “Noise sensitivity” is high, you don’t need more willpower — you need a noise strategy. If “Mind‑wandering drift” is high, you don’t need to shame yourself — you need fewer open loops and shorter focus sprints. If “Notification pull” is high, you don’t need to delete your phone — you need better defaults (batching, focus mode, and friction).
Ultimately, the goal is not perfect focus. The goal is a life where your attention mostly goes where you choose. Use the score as a compass, not a verdict.
MaximCalculator builds fast, human-friendly tools. Always treat results as educational self‑reflection, and double-check any important decisions with qualified professionals.