Set your inputs
Tip: answer for your real behavior. If a market drop would make you panic‑sell, that matters more than what you “should” do. Results update live as you move sliders.
A quick, non‑financial‑advice self‑check. Move the sliders to estimate your 0–100 investor risk score, get a simple profile (Conservative → Aggressive), and see a starting allocation you can adjust.
Tip: answer for your real behavior. If a market drop would make you panic‑sell, that matters more than what you “should” do. Results update live as you move sliders.
Investing risk is not just “how brave you feel.” It’s a blend of ability to take risk (your finances and time horizon), willingness to take risk (your emotions and behavior during volatility), and need to take risk (your goals and required return). This calculator turns those three ideas into a simple 0–100 Risk Tolerance Score and a practical profile you can act on. It’s designed for clarity and conversation — not as financial advice or a guarantee of results.
A good “risk match” is the one you can maintain when the market is boring and when it’s chaotic. If your plan is too aggressive for your behavior, you may sell at the worst time. If it’s too conservative for your goals, you may not keep up with inflation or reach milestones. The score here is a starting point to choose a strategy that is both mathematically reasonable and emotionally sustainable.
Each slider produces a value from 1 to 10. Some sliders increase risk tolerance (e.g., longer horizon), while others reduce it (e.g., high short‑term liquidity need). We convert these into a weighted average and scale to 0–100.
Every slider is already on a 1–10 scale. For factors that reduce risk tolerance, we invert them so that “higher is better” for tolerance:
liquidityScore = 11 − liquidityNeeddebtScore = 11 − debtPressuredropComfort = 11 − panic (where “panic” is your urge to sell)We then compute a weighted average (still on a 1–10 scale). The weights intentionally emphasize what tends to matter most in real life: time horizon and behavior under stress.
If we call that weighted average W, then W is between 1 and 10.
Finally, we map the 1–10 scale to 0–100 using:
Score = ((W − 1) / 9) × 100
This means a “neutral” mid‑range set of answers typically lands around the middle. We clamp the final score to 0–100 and round to a whole number for readability.
Your score becomes a profile label and a suggested “risk mix.” These are not promises — they are a planning shorthand.
The output also includes a suggested asset allocation (stocks/bonds/cash) as a starting point. Your real allocation should reflect your taxes, account types, local laws, and personal constraints — but the big idea holds: higher risk tolerance tends to support a higher stock allocation, while lower tolerance tends to support more bonds/cash.
Inputs: time horizon 2 years, high liquidity need, low experience, high debt pressure, unstable income, and a strong urge to sell during drops. The score will likely fall in the Conservative range.
Interpretation: You’re not “bad at investing.” You simply have a setup where volatility could cause real harm (needing money soon) and where panic‑selling is likely. A conservative plan might mean a larger cash buffer, short‑duration bonds, and only a modest equity slice.
Inputs: horizon 10–15 years, moderate emergency fund, stable job, moderate comfort with volatility, and willingness to hold through downturns. The score often lands in Cautious Balanced or Balanced Growth.
Interpretation: A diversified stock‑and‑bond portfolio with disciplined rebalancing can be a good match. The key behavior is staying invested and not constantly changing strategy based on news.
Inputs: horizon 20+ years, strong emergency fund, low debt pressure, stable income, high comfort with volatility, and a “hold or buy more” reaction to market drops. This usually scores as Aggressive Growth.
Interpretation: You may be able to tolerate higher equity exposure and focus on long‑term compounding, while accepting that temporary drawdowns can be uncomfortable — even when you’re “good” at risk.
Use the result in three steps:
If you want a simple rule: your risk plan should feel slightly boring most of the time. If it feels thrilling, you may be taking more risk than you realize. If it feels painfully slow, you may need either more time, more savings, or a carefully higher allocation.
No. Capacity is your financial ability to withstand losses (time horizon, stability, buffers). Tolerance includes your emotions and behavior. A good plan respects both.
If you need money soon, a market decline can force you to sell at a bad time. Short-term needs often belong in cash or lower-volatility instruments.
Because many investors don’t fail due to math — they fail due to behavior. If a 20–30% drop would cause you to sell everything, a high‑risk plan is unlikely to survive.
Yes. It often changes with age, confidence, income stability, emergency fund strength, and past market experience. Re-check periodically (or after major life events).
Not necessarily. Bonds can reduce drawdowns and give you rebalancing “ammo.” The best mix is the one you can hold through a full market cycle.
No. This tool is educational and for self-reflection. For personalized advice, consult a qualified financial professional.
A score is only useful if it changes decisions. Here are simple actions that match the biggest levers.
Your risk score is a snapshot. Real decisions should consider your full financial picture, taxes, retirement accounts, insurance coverage, and local laws.
MaximCalculator builds fast, human-friendly tools. Always treat results as educational self‑reflection, and double-check important decisions with qualified professionals.