Rate your leadership signals
Choose a context, then move each slider from 1 (rarely) to 10 (consistently). Think of your “typical week,” not your best day.
A quick, non‑clinical leadership self‑reflection. Rate 10 signals (initiative, communication, empathy, decisiveness, accountability, strategy, resilience and more) to get a 0–100 score, a simple “current style” label, and practical next steps you can try this week.
Choose a context, then move each slider from 1 (rarely) to 10 (consistently). Think of your “typical week,” not your best day.
This calculator uses ten sliders, each scored from 1 to 10. Each slider represents a leadership signal you can practice in real life. The tool then computes a weighted average and scales it to a 0–100 score.
Why a weighted average? Not all leadership behaviors contribute equally in most environments. For example, communication clarity and accountability tend to have outsized effects: if expectations are unclear or follow‑through is weak, even great ideas and high energy can fail. On the other hand, skills like delegation and influence often become more important as your responsibilities grow. We use balanced weights that work for most contexts — and the output is best used as a directional snapshot, not a definitive ranking.
First, we multiply each slider (1–10) by its weight. Then we add those weighted values together. That gives a weighted score that still lives on a 1–10 scale. Finally, we convert 1–10 into 0–100.
In formula form:
The conversion step matters because a 1–10 slider is intuitive, while a 0–100 score is easier to compare over time. A score of 50 means you’re roughly in the middle of your self‑ratings: some behaviors are showing up, some are inconsistent. A score of 80+ means your leadership habits are showing up consistently across most signals.
Along with your score, the calculator produces a simple style label based on patterns: your highest signals (“strengths”) and lowest signals (“growth levers”). This isn’t a personality test — it’s a behavior pattern interpretation. Two people can have the same score but different styles. For example, one person may be “Decisive Driver” (high initiative + decisiveness), while another is “People‑First Builder” (high empathy + communication).
Examples help you calibrate your sliders. The goal is not to “score high,” but to be honest and identify what to practice next.
Someone who delivers results but avoids conflict might rate: Initiative 8, Communication 6, Empathy 7, Decisiveness 5, Accountability 8, Strategy 6, Influence 5, Delegation 4, Resilience 7, Integrity 8. This often yields a mid‑to‑high 60s score with a label like “Reliable Stabilizer”. Growth lever: decisiveness and influence (making clearer calls and aligning others earlier).
Another person might be high energy, low follow‑through: Initiative 9, Communication 6, Empathy 5, Decisiveness 8, Accountability 4, Strategy 5, Influence 7, Delegation 5, Resilience 6, Integrity 7. That can land in the low‑60s with a label like “Vision‑Mover”. Growth lever: accountability (closing loops, documenting commitments).
Someone strong in relationships might rate: Initiative 6, Communication 8, Empathy 9, Decisiveness 6, Accountability 7, Strategy 6, Influence 7, Delegation 6, Resilience 6, Integrity 9. This often scores 70–80 with a label like “People‑First Builder”. Growth lever: strategy and decisiveness (clear priorities + quicker decisions).
If you’re unsure what a “7” vs “9” means, use this rule of thumb: 7 = consistent most weeks, 9 = consistent even under pressure. A “3” usually means you do it occasionally or only in easy situations.
Scores only help if they change behavior. The simplest method is the 1‑point plan: pick your lowest slider and choose a tiny action that would raise it by just one point. One point is realistic. Five points is fantasy (and usually makes people quit).
People love sharing “style labels.” That’s why this page generates a short style summary you can copy. But the most meaningful share is not “I’m a leader” — it’s “Here’s what I’m practicing this month.” If you post your result, consider adding one line like: “My growth lever is accountability — I’m closing loops daily.” That’s memorable, useful, and invites others to share their own growth target.
Reminder: leadership ability is contextual. You can be a great leader in one environment and still be learning in another. Use this tool as a starting point for reflection and feedback conversations.
No. It’s a self‑reflection calculator. Hiring assessments typically use validated instruments and structured scoring. This tool is designed for personal insight and habit‑building.
Yes. Leadership is influence, clarity, and ownership — not a title. Many leaders are individual contributors, volunteers, parents, mentors, or students who guide outcomes.
Monthly is ideal if you’re actively improving. Weekly can be useful during intense projects, but don’t over‑optimize. Look for trends over time.
In most teams, clarity and follow‑through drive results. They also reduce confusion and conflict, making other leadership behaviors easier to practice.
A low score usually means your leadership behaviors are inconsistent right now — often due to stress, unclear expectations, or low confidence. Pick one small lever, practice it weekly, and reassess.
Not necessarily. Personality can influence style (quiet vs expressive), but leadership is mostly behaviors and skills: communication, decision‑making, empathy, planning, and integrity — all learnable.
No. It means you rated these behaviors as consistent for yourself. Other people may have different strengths, contexts, or values. Treat the score as a mirror, not a trophy.
If you liked this, you’ll probably like these too:
Use this score to notice patterns, start feedback conversations, and choose small growth habits. Don’t use it to label yourself or others. If you’re navigating workplace conflict, burnout, or anxiety, a mentor, coach, or qualified professional can help you interpret what you’re experiencing.
MaximCalculator builds fast, human-friendly tools. Treat results as educational self‑reflection. For important career decisions, combine self‑reflection with evidence, coaching, and real feedback.